Last year, national Democrats exhibited a shocking inability to think past the end of their nose. In the December runoff in Louisiana, the Dems and their allies left former-Senator Mary Landrieu (man, that phrase sounds great!) to her own devices against then-Rep. Dr. Bill Cassidy. The Senate map in 2016 favors Democrats (and it’s a presidential year, which always favors the left) and retaining that one seat last year would have made their battle next year a bit easier. But they gave up, which was a strategic blunder, in my professional opinion.
Politico reported earlier this afternoon that the Republican National Convention “quickly pulled down a draft copy of its 2012 platform” after “an apparent staff error led to its posting” on the RNC website.
I have to wonder, with all of the press this past week covering the dumb remarks made by Todd Akin (R-MO) and Mitt Romney’s jest “birther” comment, was the posting really an accident? Or was it the GOP’s way of finally shifting the news back to the Republican message?
If it was the latter, kudos to whomever’s brilliant idea it was. And if it was truly an accident, I suspect someone will fade quietly into the Tampa night.
By now, you’ve all heard the news: Romney-Ryan 2012! The Republican nominee for President (yes, I’ve dispensed with the “presumptive” tag), Mitt Romney, has selected Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) as his running mate. His choice obviously departs from my prediction, but it’s a great choice.
I’m sure everyone knows a little bit about who Paul Ryan is, so I won’t detail his biography here. But I do want to hit a few high points for you—points I believe will are significant to the election. Rep. Paul Ryan is an energetic 42-year-old Catholic family man from Wisconsin. He is the always-controversial Chairman of the House Budget Committee and is about as conservative as they come. But what do these biographical points have to do with the election? Let’s review. (more…)
I have a special fondness for Oklahoma’s Second Congressional District. Not only did I grow up in the district, but most of my family still lives there. It’s a mostly rural district with only a couple of urban areas of over 30,000 people, covering most of the eastern portion of the state, including my hometown of Tahlequah. So it’s with a little bit of excitement that I get to write about the Republican runoff currently in progress there. (more…)
We’ve heard so much gab in recent months about who Mitt Romney, the GOP’s all-but nominee for president, will or should choose as his running mate. Every name you can think of has been mentioned: Chris Christie, New Jersey’s loud-mouth yet lovable governor; Marco Rubio, Florida’s junior (and did I mention Hispanic?) U.S. Senator; and Paul Ryan, the ever-controversial chairman of the House Budget Committee. There has even been talk about names most have never heard: Bob McDonnell, the governor of Virginia, and Mitch Daniels, Indiana’s chief executive.
But now that the Veepstakes has entered its audition phase, the question everyone will be asking is: “Who will he choose?” Will it be Rubio or Ryan? Will it be Bachmann or Bobby (Jindal, that is)? But the question that appeals to me isn’t so much “who,” but rather “how?” And that’s what I’ll write about. (more…)
President Barack Obama has a history of “evolving” on the issue of gay marriage. In 2004, when running for the Illinois State Senate, he said “that marriage is between a man and a woman.” Now, six years later, he has done a complete one-eighty. On Wednesday, the president announced that he “affirm[s] that…same sex couples should be able to get married.” While each of us has the right to change our mind on issues, Mr. Obama will face a substantial political backlash in light of this particular flip-flop. (more…)